PLANNING COMMISSION

Hanover Township        Northampton County

3630 JACKSONVILLE ROAD

BETHLEHEM, PA 18107

 

 

 

Minutes of the July 17, 2006 Meeting

 

Meeting #824 of the Hanover Township Northampton County Planning Commission was held at the Hanover Township Municipal Building, 3630 Jacksonville Road, Bethlehem, Pennsylvania, Monday, July 17, 2006, and convened at 7:30 P.M.

 

Planning Commission members in attendance:

                        Mark Tanczos                          Joseph Hilton

                        Paul Kuehne                             Susan Lawless

                        George Scoggin                        Glenn Taggart

Hanover Engineering Associates, Inc. represented by James B. Birdsall, P.E.

 

Motion was made by Taggart, seconded by Hilton, to approve the minutes of the June 5, 2006 Planning Commission Meeting.

   Hilton, yes;   Kuehne, yes;   Lawless, abstain;   Taggart, yes;   Scoggin, yes;   Tanczos, yes

 

Rescheduling of the July meeting was duly advertised.

 

LEHIGH VALLEY INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT     Lot Location Plan

Perimeter Property Survey/Lot Consolidation Plan            Record Plan

Mark Blaukovitch (McTish, Kunkel & Assoc.)         Lawrence Krauter (Airport Authority)

 

The reason for consolidation is to simplify all of the Airport holdings.

 

Zoning comments are as follows:

Future developer(s) for any parcel of land must be aware of their responsibility for frontage on each side of the property.  Clarification is needed in note on plan.

Individual Zoning Districts, including adjoining properties, on each of the recording documents should be identified.  This should include the AFD Overlay.

All front, rear or side yards, must be labeled.

 

S.A.L.D.O. comments are as follows:

Section 159-10H – Planners do not agree with requested deferral.  Right-of-way along existing   

     streets should be shown at this time for the benefit of future developers and PennDot.

Section 159-11C – Deferral requested from providing additional width where existing streets do

     not provide proper widths.

Section 159-12B – Metes and bounds should be shown for all existing easements.  If easements

     are for development, such as road, drainage, etc., each future developer must provide

     easements.

     

     

LEHIGH VALLEY INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT Continued

Section 159-15M – Deferral requested from showing monument and iron pins.  Planners suggest

     monuments be shown at major control points.

Section 159-29B – Adjoining subdivision and street names must be shown.  Name correction         

   will be made to Stephen Crane Lane.

Section 159-30C.(2) – Corrections must be made to legal descriptions.  In Parcel G, only

      seven (7) acres are in Hanover Township.  LNAA Land Annexed to Hanover Township

      section should be removed, as well as Hanover Township New Parcel.

Section 159-31.A.(2) – Waiver requested pertaining to two (2) acre lot size.

 

Twenty (20) foot walkway paths were removed from plan.  These must be shown.

 

Waiver/deferral requests were voted upon.

Motion was made by Tanczos, seconded by Kuehne, recommending waiver of SALDO Section 159-31.A.(2) regarding acreage.

   Hilton, yes;   Kuehne, yes;   Lawless, yes;   Taggart, yes;   Scoggin, yes;   Tanczos, yes

 

Deferral request for SALDO Section 159-10.H will be withdrawn.

 

Motion was made by Tanczos, seconded by Hilton, recommending deferral of SALDO Section 159-11.C.  Street widths can be deferred until such time when lot development occurs.

  Hilton, yes;   Kuehne, yes;   Lawless, yes;   Taggart, yes;   Scoggin, yes;   Tanczos, yes

 

Motion was made by Tanczos, seconded by Kuehne, recommending deferral of SALDO Section 159-15.M regarding monument identification.  Monuments should be shown at major control points; however, monuments at nonstrategic points can be deferred until the time of development.

  Hilton, yes;   Kuehne, yes;   Lawless, yes;   Taggart, yes;   Scoggin, yes;   Tanczos, yes

 

Motion was made by Tanczos, seconded by Taggart, to send a letter to the Board of Supervisors recommending Conditional Approval based on satisfaction of comments in letter from Hanover Engineering, dated June 30, 2006.  Pedestrian Trail Easement must be included on the Plan.  Legal descriptions must be updated.

  Hilton, yes;   Kuehne, yes;   Lawless, yes;   Taggart, yes;   Scoggin, yes;   Tanczos, yes

 

 

 

     

                                                                       

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

LVIP IV – LOT 45 – Minrad, Inc.     Proposed Building Addition     Preliminary/Record Plan  

Ronald Madison (Gilmore Assoc.)        Dr. Joshua Levinson, PhD (Chemist)

 

Warehouse addition is proposed.  Madison advised that approval has been received from       LVIP IV, letter dated July 10, 2006. 

 

Original water allocation was 19,900 gallons per day … sewage 9,900 gallons per day.  Average use is currently 6,900 gallons per day.  Madison stated allocations will not be exceeded due to employee increase and building expansion.  Correspondence from Bethlehem Township regarding clean outs will be provided.

 

54 parking spaces will be provided.  56 additional spaces will be provided as future (26 along the northern side).  If future parking is required to be installed, impervious cover must be addressed.  Minrad must return to the Township for review and approval.

Future access road will not be constructed at this time.

 

There are two (2) existing loading docks.  Tank farm shows two (2) additional can be added in the future.  Tank unloading area could be identified as another loading area.  Warehouse plan proposes two (2) additional docks.

 

Existing building height is 42 feet.  Proposed highest point is 35 feet.  Roof drainage is part of the tank farm plan.  Drainage resolution is needed.

 

Fire Marshal approval is requested.  Question remains on whether fire lane can be narrowed.  Siamese hydrant is now being provided.  Water line is being extended to another hydrant.

 

Clarification is requested on note about perimeter driveway.

 

Waivers requested in letter, dated June 23, 2006, from Ronald Madison of Gilmore & Associates

were discussed and voted upon.

Motion was made by Tanczos, seconded by Lawless, recommending waiver of Zoning Sections 185-17C and 18C pertaining to waiving the construction of 56 future parking spaces.  54 parking spaces are being provided.  Note 14 on the plan must be revised.  If the Zoning Officer requires that additional parking is needed in the future, Minrad must return to the Township for review and approval due to impervious cover concerns.

  Hilton, yes;   Kuehne, yes;   Lawless, yes;   Taggart, yes;   Scoggin, yes;   Tanczos, yes

 

Motion was made by Tanczos, seconded by Hilton, recommending waiver of SALDO Section 159-17F.  Replacement trees will be planted by Minrad off site at the direction of the Township.

  Hilton, yes;   Kuehne, yes;   Lawless, yes;   Taggart, yes;   Scoggin, yes;   Tanczos, yes

 

Motion was made by Tanczos, seconded by Scoggin, recommending waiver of SALDO Section 159-29C.(6)(b)&(f).  Drip lines need not be designated for trees that are to be removed.

  Hilton, yes;   Kuehne, yes;   Lawless, yes;   Taggart, yes;   Scoggin, yes;   Tanczos, yes

 

 

LVIP IV – LOT 45 Continued

Motion was made by Tanczos, seconded by Kuehne, to send a letter to the Board of Supervisors recommending Conditional Approval based on satisfaction of comments in letter from Hanover Engineering, dated July 12, 2006.  Approval is needed from the Fire Marshal.  Parking is not allowed in Fire Zones.  Note 14 should be revised.  If Township Zoning Officer requires construction of additional parking in the future,  Minrad must return to the Township for review and approval due to impervious cover concerns.

 

HANOVER HIGHLANDS – LOT 2          Sotel Enterprises

Preliminary/Record Plan

Mark Buchvalt (Schoor DePalma)

 

Proposed is a 3-story building containing 107 apartments for the elderly, along with parking.

Handicapped spaces (14 total) are located near the entry, also next to the elevators in the underground parking garage.

 

Zoning Section 185-18C – Off Street Loading – Developer feels one (1) loading space is sufficient.  Planners are concerned about moving vans moving tenants in or out.  Is one space sufficient?  Developer stated moving would be scheduled.  They will review this.

 

Zoning Section 185-22B.(1) – Building height is 33’6”.  Tower at 60’ consists of a 30’ stair tower … the next 30’ is an ornamental tower topped with a cupola.  Approximately 27’ extends above the building.  Tower construction is steel stud and concrete.  Cupola is wooden.  An FAA light exists on transmission tower near this site.  Planners questioned elevations of proposed tower and FAA light.  Certification was requested from Architect, assuring if tower should collapse, it would fall within the lot line.  Architect stated they will consider reducing tower height to 54’, making it the same height as the other cupola.  Letter will also be furnished. 

 

Traffic Impact Study will be provided.

Zoning Officer was contacted for comments regarding proposed greenhouse.  This is offered as an amenity for the residents.

Sanitary Sewer allocation will be adjusted due to the change in number of proposed units.

 

Fire Marshal’s approval is needed.

 

Chairman Tanczos requested the approximate number of ambulance trips per month based on information from the Pottstown site.

 

Two elevators are provided.  One can accommodate a gurney, one cannot.  Planner Hilton asked whether our ambulance personnel review these plans to see if this is acceptable.  Elevator breakdown is a concern.  Hilton recommends that the ambulance head review and offer comments.

 

Sacred Heart Hospital declined operating a wellness center at this site; therefore, one is not being proposed at this time.

 

 

PNC BANK         Stoke Park Road         Lot Consolidation Plan

Robert Yurro (Kenderian-Zilinski Assoc.)       Dennis McCarthy (PNC Bank)

George Scoggin (Owner)

 

Planner George Scoggin abstained from offering any comments on this submittal.

 

New PNC Bank Branch is proposed at the northwest corner of Stoke Park Road and Route 512. Proposal is to combine four individual lots, currently owned by Scoggin, into one 1.3 acre parcel.

 

Applications have been made to Lehigh Valley Planning Commission, Soil Conservation District.

 

There are utility poles located on the west side of the property.  Title will be checked.

 

Outstanding issues addressed in letter from Hanover Engineering, dated July 10, 2006, will be addressed.

 

PNC BANK     Stoke Park Road       Site Plan        Preliminary/Record Plan

Robert Yurro (Kenderian-Zilinski Assoc.)       Ralph Walker (Gensler Architect)

Dennis McCarthy (PNC Bank)      Susan Golumb (PNC Bank)      George Scoggin (Owner)

 

Planner George Scoggin abstained from offering any comments on this submittal.

 

Proposed one-story bank at 3,700 square feet will be a LEED (leadership, energy and environmental design) building.  Major features … materials come from within 500 miles of the site … low profile roof line that provides good shading … provide day lighting into all spaces of the bank … materials are energy efficient.   Building height is 17 feet, 24 feet at its peak.

Proposed bank will replace PNC Bank located on Schoenersville Road.

27 parking spaces are proposed.

 

30 foot wide single access driveway is located off of Stoke Park Road opposite Fairview Street.

It is felt the traffic signal gaps will provide adequate safe entries into bank.  There is an existing left turn lane for traffic coming east on Stoke Park Road.

 

Two 24-hour ATMs will be provided.  One is a walk up located near the entry.  Second is located in the drive through.  The ATM areas are the only lighted areas after hours.

 

Lighting will be no higher than 16 feet, shielded, keeping light only on this property.  Lighting on the drive aisle will be provided.

 

No dumpsters are proposed.  Documents are shredded and taken out nightly.  Lunch trash will be removed by cleaning crews.

 

 

 

 

 

PNC BANK Continued

Bank wishes to have a monument sign on Route 512, two (2) building signs at entry and along south side facing Stoke Park Road.   Entrance/exit sign will be located at the driveway.  Directional signs for main entrance and drive through will be provided.  Signage package will be presented.  Planner Taggart offered his preference for a carved wooden sign, subdued lighting of signs.

 

Traffic Study will be provided.

 

Landscape Plan will be provided.  Dense evergreen hedge should be provided at the southeast corner of the building, also to screen the property to the north.

Sidewalk and shade trees are required along Stoke Park Road.  Right-of-way line runs concurrent with existing curb line.  Seven (7) foot landscape strip must contain sidewalk, four (4) shade trees and screening.

In order to accomplish this, considerations are to reduce two lanes along the south side of the bank … four (4) foot wide sidewalks rather than five (5) foot wide … bank building may be reduced … grated trees within sidewalk a possibility.

Sidewalks required along Route 512 may be deferred.

 

Birdsall advised that parking spaces are located within the side yard setback.  This must be addressed.

 

Developer will request a waiver from providing a Noise Study. 

 

Fire Marshal comments are requested

 

Comments from the Shade Tree Commission were received.

 

Outstanding issues, outlined in letter from Hanover Engineering dated July 11, 2006, will be addressed.  

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

LVIP IV – LOT 12         Site Plan         Preliminary/Record Plan

Terry DeGroot (Medina Consultants)         Joe Landrigan (North Star)

 

Proposed are three (3) separate one-story buildings with a total square footage of 38,000 square feet.  Adequate parking is provided.

 

Elevations will be submitted.  Roof drain details will be provided.

 

Two driveways are proposed off of North Commerce Way … one located at approximately the center of the site … another at the western edge of the site.  Both driveways offer a safer flow, preventing cross-traffic.  Following discussion, Planners concur.

 

Waiver deferral will be requested from installing sidewalks along North Commerce Way.  Sidewalks are established on the opposite side of the street.  Deferral will also be requested for frontage on Hanoverville Road.

 

Fire Marshal’s comments are requested.

 

Access to detention pond will be west of existing pond gate.  Pond maintenance responsibilities will be determined.

 

Developer will tie into existing sanitary sewer lateral.

 

Comments were received from the Shade Tree Commission.

 

Outstanding issues, noted in letter from Hanover Engineering dated July 11, 2006, will be addressed.

 

ZONING ORDINANCE AMENDMENT   

Rezoning from Agricultural (A) to Planned Industrial/Business District (PIBD)

 

Proposed rezoning was discussed.

 

Motion was made by Tanczos, seconded by Scoggin, to send a letter to the Board of Supervisors recommending rezoning from Agricultural (A) to Planned Industrial/Business District (PIBD)

as change is in conformance with the goals of the Comprehensive Plan.

  Hilton, yes;   Kuehne, yes;   Lawless, yes;   Taggart, yes;   Scoggin, yes;   Tanczos, yes

 

 

 

                                                                        Sylvia McLaughlin - Clerk