
PLANNING COMMISSION
Minutes of the
May 3, 2004 Meeting
Meeting #803 of the Hanover Township Northampton County
Planning Commission was held at the
Planning Commission members in attendance:
Mark Tanczos Joseph Hilton
Paul Kuehne Karen Fritz
John McGonigle Glenn Taggart
Hanover Engineering Associates, Inc. represented by Charles M. Schmalzer, P.L.S.
On the motion of McGonigle,
seconded by Kuehne, the minutes of the
This is an existing non-conformity with existing
buildings, a driveway on one side and property line on the other side. A long narrow detention pond is proposed
along the length of this property along
Five proposed waivers were discussed by Planners. Planner Kuehne recommended that a fence be provided as pond would be approximately 3 ˝ feet in a 100 year storm. There are children on the property and their safety must be considered. Split rail fence was suggested.
Motion was made by Tanczos, seconded by Kuehne, recommending waiver of Section 152-7.B(3) allowing 2 year runoff to exceed by .01-cfs.
Hilton, yes; Kuehne, yes; McGonigle, yes; Taggart, yes; Fritz, yes; Tanczos, yes
Motion was made by Tanczos, seconded by McGongile, recommending waiver of Section 152-10.I.6(a), allowing water depth of 2.93 feet for a 10 year storm in a small area of pond, rather than 2 feet required by Ordinance
Hilton, yes; Kuehne, yes; McGonigle, yes; Taggart, yes; Fritz, yes; Tanczos, yes
Motion was made by Tanczos, seconded by Kuehne, recommending waiver of Section 152-10.I.6(b), allowing water depth of 3.48 feet for a 100 year storm with the provision that a fence be installed around entire pond for the purpose of preventing access to the pond by children. Landscaping acceptable to the Township per Township Ordinance should be provided on the southern portion of lot between adjacent property owner.
Hilton, yes; Kuehne, yes; McGonigle, yes; Taggart, yes; Fritz, yes; Tanczos, yes
Motion was made by Tanczos,
seconded by McGonigle, recommending waiver of Section
152-10.I.6(c), allowing 3.1 slope on the southern side near property line. Pond will be maintained by
Hilton, yes; Kuehne, yes; McGonigle, yes; Taggart, yes; Fritz, yes; Tanczos, yes
Motion was made by Tanczos, seconded by Kuehne, recommending waiver of Section 152-10.I.10, allowing a 1% slope with the use of a cable concrete channel.
Hilton, yes; Kuehne, yes; McGonigle, yes; Taggart, yes; Fritz, yes; Tanczos, yes
JAINDL LAND COMPANY
Preliminary/Record Plan
Scott Pidcock Bruce Anderson (The Pidcock Company)
David Jaindl (Jaindl Land Company)
Plan proposes to combine all of
Developer has designated 7
Letter from Township Engineer, dated April 29, 2004,
states Residue Land 5 should be designated at
IDI is listed as preexisting.
Discussion was held between developer and the Township on
whether there might be a better use for the land south of proposed
Jaindl’s off site commitments in
the five million dollars range will be honored.
Residential would not generate the value equated to PIBD. Therefore, developer is requesting that 11 additional acres
Zoned PIBD be added to COMMERCIAL (
JAINDL -
Total traffic would be diminished by 10%, as there is a traffic reduction for this type of Residential community compared with PIBD. The increase in COMMERCIAL from PIBD is not as great as the decrease for Residential.
Eastern property line of
Main access to Residential would be off
Residential would be an independent project including
private roads. J. B. Reilly of
Traditions of America would be the developer.
Planner Kuehne asked whether this would be a
gated community. Reilly proposes a berm with landscape buffer along
A 7,000 square foot club house would be built, pool, tennis court, putting green. All homes are designed as single floor residences with 2 car garages....1st floor master bedrooms with options for 2nd floor loft areas Options for bump out rooms in the back, four-season rooms, screened in porches, home customization. Base house is 1800 to 2000 square feet. Four homes are built on one acre. There is 15 feet distance side by side, 50 feet back to back. Homes are 38 to 40 feet wide. Association ownership is responsible for maintaining roads, snow removal, mowing grass, trash, club house amenities. Reserves are built into budget for roof replacement, etc.
Planners requested that sidewalks be included with this project, enabling people to access COMMERCIAL area.
COMMERCIAL Use - Projected on
Projected on
Smaller commercial structures would likely be included on each lot.
Chairman Tanczos expressed concern that Commercial maintain the character of the Township. Big box structures are not desirable.
Township
The IDI development is extending utilities water, sanitary, storm) north to Residue Lands #2.
Planners asked that water tie in be
made available for residents along
JAINDL -
Upon receiving Township approval and PennDot permits, developer will begin road improvements.
Revision to Agreement is being done.
Planner Taggart asked if there would be provision for pedestrian/bicycle crossings at Route 512 from the west side residential development to proposed Commercial. Recreational circulation system in the Township is being looked at. The east and west sides should not be isolated. Design should take this into account.
Pidcock stated a sidewalk might not be advisable in this type of location because of municipality liability to promote a pathway in a busy location. Pidcock wondered how traffic signal could tolerate that level of interruption.
Taggart would take the time away from the north/south traffic to provide for that safe crossing. Quick traffic movement through that area should not be encouraged.
Chairman Tanczos likes the Residential. Agreement must be worked out with the Board of Supervisors. Amount of Commercial, types and sizes of users should be determined.
Planner Hilton agrees with Residential concept. It’s needed. Only question is whether this is the right location. Buffer must be adequate. Large box construction is not appropriate.
Planner Kuehne likes concept. Concerned about noise from the boulevard. Buffering must be a big consideration.
Planner Taggart - concept seems reasonable. Issues brought up should be addressed.
Supervisor Frank Colon questioned road hookup from
Commercial to
Pidcock advised when there is a
land development plan for
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN DISCUSSION
Planners and Supervisor Colon expressed desire to preserve
Open Space with emphasis on the property under the flight path, the Gulick property, the Monocacy
Creek near