
PLANNING COMMISSION
Minutes of the
October 3, 2005 Meeting
Meeting #818 of the Hanover Township Northampton County
Planning Commission was held at the
Planning Commission members in attendance:
Mark Tanczos Joseph Hilton
Paul Kuehne John McGonigle
Susan Lawless George Scoggin
Hanover Engineering Associates, Inc. represented by James B. Birdsall, P.E.
Township Solicitor Wendy Nicolosi, Esq.
Motion was made by McGonigle,
seconded by Kuehne, approving the minutes of the
Hilton, yes; Kuehne, yes; McGonigle, yes; Lawless, yes; Scoggin, yes; Tanczos, yes
LVCC II -
Paul Szewczak (
Proposed is a 100 unit limited service hotel with outdoor pool, along with a 5, 400 square foot restaurant. Meeting room will be eliminated. Great room in essence is the lobby area. Detailed architecturals will be provided.
Plan shows 218 parking spaces, two off-street loading spaces.
Access is a right in only off of
Note will be added to plan identifying noise attenuating construction. Waiver will be requested from Noise Study requirement (Section 159-25).
Traffic Study completed for Conditional Use should be provided.
Proposed parking lot is 5 feet within setback....hotel is located 7 feet on a Residential Restriction Line. These will be corrected.
Stormwater drainage will be reviewed with Township Engineer.
Planner Kuehne is concerned that
traffic patterns are a safety hazard, conflicting with Bennigan’s
traffic. South of the
Lighting will be provided across the front of proposed hotel. Security lighting is shown above doorways. Parking lots will have light standards, typical to those located in LVCC.
Plans were submitted to the Township Fire Marshal.
Comments were received from the Shade Tree Commission.
David Jaindl (Developer) Joseph Zator, II, Esq. (Attorney)
Bruce Anderson (Pidcock Company)
Subdivision Plan consists of three Commercial lots, a
residential Adult Community, PIBD lots north of proposed
Chairman Tanczos stated that everything must be shown on the plan. Lots are created requiring berms, setbacks and landscaping, even though some are not proposed to be developed at this time. Developer anticipated improvements would occur as each lot comes in for development.
Jaindl advised extensive off
site road traffic improvements are part of this project. Completion will occur in phases, triggered on
traffic thresholds. Each component of
this subdivision would be a different phase.
As part of this project,
Road improvements south on Route 512, signalization at
intersection of
Planning requests a unified Site Plan. Zator stated buffering, curb cuts, grading would depend upon the user of a particular lot. These improvements can be shown on the plan, however, they do not feel required to secure improvements for lots prior to development. Depending upon user, there could be changes.
Birdsall stated that phasing can be looked at with an agreement made giving consideration to construction compatibility, doing things in a logical order.
The next development project would be the Adult Community. Zator advised berming along the south property line and the PIBD will be the responsibility of J. B. Reilly per agreement between Jaindl and Reilly.
Reilly confirmed that he will construct buffer/berming as part of the Adult Community development. Plan review should be part of Planning’s November agenda. Timetable for berm construction would be in spring of 2006.
Jaindl envisions berm at
Proposed driveway location for Commercial lots was given considerable thought. There are right turns shown off of Route 512 to the 3 ˝ acre lot, also another to Lot C-3. There will be a 300 foot deceleration lane. Curvature is gradual. Driveway intersections along Jaindl and Commerce Boulevards must allow for queuing without any interruptions. Traffic calculations are requested to support all intersections to assure they are proposed in a safe way.
Hilton questioned proposed right turn in location so close to
Jaindl advised
Responses were made to comments in Hanover Engineering’s
letter dated
General - Nicolosi advised that phasing determination would satisfy comment to disallow the sale of Lots 1, 2, 3, 4, 10 and 11.
General - Pertaining to three slivers of land in
Comment 5 - Additional right-of-way for the realignment of
Comment 6 - Right-of-way for
Comment 10 -
Comment 14 - Setbacks, easements, buffers, etc. will be shown on the plan.
Comment 15 - Propose phased improvements.
Section 185-35.A - Covenants and restrictions recorded for IDI will apply to all PIBD lots.
Section 185-35.F(3) - 100 foot
setback from the center line of
Section 159-11.D - Developer thought it would be beneficial to have a wider distance of grass. This should be discussed with the Township Manager. Waiver may be requested.
Section 159-16 - Contribution will be made for the Open Space requirement.
Section 152-10.I(3) - Detention basin will be a wet pond.
Section 152-10.I(10) - Waiver will be needed for proposed 1% bottom slope.
Waiver will be requested for length of cul-de-sac on
Resident asked about water coming along
Sylvia McLaughlin
Clerk - Planning Commission